Should You Be Judged by What You Did 30+ Years Ago?
I haven't listened to all of the arguments concerning Brett Kavanaugh's alleged sexual assault over 36 years ago. This is what I know: Too much time, attention, energy, money, etc. have been spent on what did or did not happen over three decades ago. Personally, I think Kavanaugh is probably guilty of exceedingly gross misconduct. Did he actually do what he was accused of? It's very probable. But, while I am not trying to minimize or dismiss the misconduct almost everyone is missing the point of the confirmation hearings... Will Kavanaugh be a good justice and perform his Constitutional duties as a Supreme Court Justice? I want to know what he has done in the last 10-20 years. IF he did do what he was accused of, has his life been turned around? Is he better? Has he repented? If he really isn't any better than his high school, college freshman self, then that should be evident from the more recent (10-20 years) past and show he isn't fit for the job. But...